- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topics
- Tests
- Magazine
- Psych Basics
- Blogs
- Diagnosis Dictionary
Fellow blogger Dr. Stephen A. Diamond objects to my recent post titled "Why Freud and Jung Broke Up," calling it "an overly simplistic and fundamentally flawed Freudian interpretation" revolving around "repressed" homosexuality. That's a pretty thorough indictment, to say the least! Read More















Response to Professor Schultz
Please don't take my posting as an "indictment" of yours, or even an "objection," but rather as my offering a different opinion about and interpretation of the available information. And as an effort to help our readers get more involved intellectually with psychotherapy and the fascinating daimonic genius of its two greatest founders.
Thanks, ditto
I don't. Thank you. My goal is the same: just to engage what I consider an extremely interesting discussion about these two giant figures in the history of psychology... And I found your initial reply to my post to be an enormously helpful and carefully thought-through addition to what I had to say. Hopefully readers will be moved to explore the topic in more detail. A good place to begin would probably be the Freud/Jung Letters...
Thank you both for your
Thank you both for your observations about the matter. You both presented facets of the Freud/Jungian relationship that I had previously been unaware of, and you have both given me much to think about as I start exploring the work of both thinkers in more depth. Please keep up the excellent posts.
Excellent
Thanks for such a kind post.
Post new comment