The Narcissus in All of Us

Reflections on the self, personality, and what makes you, "you."
Ilan Shrira is a visiting professor of social psychology at the University of Florida. See full bio

Comments on "What we see when we see movies"

What we see when we see movies

Which of these groups is portrayed most favorably in American movies?

a) Smokers;  b) Psychiatrists;  c) CEOs;  d) P.E. teachers

Read on...


  Read More

This is a very interesting

This is a very interesting subject, and ties dirrectly into a topic im currently doing in college. I have a paper due in a few weeks on violence in the media and how, or if we think it affects us. One sterotype i think that is portrayed in film, is that of people from the south. So many films show them as ignorant, and un-educated. Being from the south i catch a lot of negative comments about my accent and where im from. Could this be from media? Im sure it has a lot to do with it.

Thanks

Norm, That’s an excellent example! There are a couple books on just this topic: "Media-Made Dixie" and "Hollywood’s Image of the South." Even though there have been and continue to be mostly positive portrayals of Southerners and the South, there are a few high-profile negative depictions that I think has made quite of an impression on the rest of the country (and the rest of the world). I imagine this bias exists because most big-time filmmakers don’t identify strongly with the South. Also, Hollywood’s values tend to be very different from the more traditional values in most of the South. This probably leads filmmakers to characterize Southerners as the bad guys more than non-Southerners (e.g., "Mississippi Burning," most Civil War films), and to more negative portrayals in general ("Deliverance"). The problem is the extreme, one-dimensional depictions that get popularized and then get associated with all things Southern. I’m assuming that Hollywood portrayals of the South are improving, but those perceptions still live on. Ilan

Thank you!

What a beautiful topic to discuss! It is really sad how the movies turned people into these careless creatures, the youth's only concern nowadays is to "look cool and pretty"... A question is being asked though, don't you think that it's the media intention to actually deliver these messages? We all meet everyday people i would like to call as "living in their own movies", it is really what's going on. And if you ask me, i think the media is doing this for very private reasons: to keep the youth's mind busy with these colorful images. Why? because they do not want people aware of what is going on in the world, they do not want people to stand up and educate themselves in order to uncover the truth behind all of Hollywood or whatever else. I myself have been dealing non-stop with this Huge amount of people incredibly(and unconsciously) influenced by the movies. The media has actually convinced the world that you can be stupid and proud, that you don't need to think about anything, just watch these colors we're giving you on your PC and TV and let US do the job...

i agree

I agree 100% with alexis. The media is owned by these huge corporations that control the content of what ever is being shown or said. The idea of a free press is almost non-existant, but thats another story. I do think this idea crosses over all the time with film. What are these directors, and producers trying to make us think? It does seem like each generation seems to be less educated.

Who has control

Thank you for the feedback. I agree that movies influence people too much, but I think there's a different reason that we’re seeing some of these themes in movies. I’m still not ready to believe we see these themes because of a deliberate goal to control people on the part of the movie studios or the media. Movie studios’ primary motivation is to make money, so they will produce ANYTHING, as long as it makes money and won’t cause a boycott of the studio. I think the best demonstration of this motivation is the fact that filmmakers routinely portray corporations and corporate executives as the bad guys (I mentioned this in my original post). This anti-business/anti-corporate bias seems to occur because individual directors and screenplay writers don’t like corporate executives who have too much power. Yet the big movie studios still produce most of these "anti-corporate" movies, usually giving the directors and writers creative control, in the hope that the film will be a hit. The fact that the studios let these films be made tells me that it’s really about the money. Also remember that sex sells. Violence sells. People are fascinated by "forbidden" activities like smoking and drug use. Having mentally ill characters and evil psychiatrists introduces excitement into the plot. Characters don’t discuss birth control options, they don't lecture each other on the dangers of drug use, and ordinary therapy sessions between psychiatrist and patient are not shown because all these things are just not interesting to the average viewer and not central to a movie’s plot. They’re not included in the movie because they’re boring and make the film unnecessarily long. The same stereotypes get played out again and again because we (people) like to see things that we know. We usually like to have our stereotypes confirmed. This makes us feel like we understand the world. Additionally, certain stereotypes have been well-received in the past (like neurotic psychiatrists), so they keep getting brought back. The overarching theme here is that the filmmakers are giving the audience what it wants, and will keep doing so as long as people keep paying to see it. Until we can socialize ourselves to avoid offensive and mindless portrayals, this is the way it will stay. I guess the upside is that each of us can be made aware of all this, and then decide for ourselves what to do about it. Ilan

Positive Stereotypes

Thank you! for this great piece.
You've done a wonderful job describing
some of the many ways movies/TV can have
an effect on people.

Critics of the media are often derided as
consorious, right-wing christian bigots who
hate freedom.

So it great to read a *scientist* writing on
a popular science blog about some of the science
behind media effects.

Positive Stereotypes

As for stereotypes, a few examples of groups
spending a lot of time, money and effort making sure
that they are positively portrayed in the media:

- Doctors & Nurses
http://www.nursingadvocacy.org/faq/media_affects_thinking.html

- Military
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2004/07/04/allied_forces/

http://www.usatoday.com/life/2005-03-07-hollywood-pentagon_x.htm

- and i'm sure there are more...

What's interestng is that these groups are
sophisticated and media-saavy enough to
realize that insisting on portrayals that
are tooo perfect would actually turn viewers
off. So they are ok with human imperfections,
but not with overly negative portrayals.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


Subscribe to The Narcissus in All of Us

Find a Therapist

Search our customized Directory for a licensed professional near you.

Current Issue

Everyday Creativity

How to start living creatively and reap the benefits.