The Hidden Brain

Our unconscious biases.

Is Compassion the Answer to Genocide?

Why does the world sit on its hands?

I gave a couple of talks and Q&As last week at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. One of the questions that came up was whether we need to increase the store of human compassion in order to better deal with the problem of apathy in the face of genocide. Why has the world sat on its hands so often as mass murder has unfolded?

The final chapter of The Hidden Brain examines this issue, and suggests that unconscious biases in the way empathy works could be responsible for human apathy in the face of mass suffering. The most paradoxical conclusion of the research I write about is that as human suffering increases, it appears that our capacity to empathize with such suffering decreases. We are most able to behave compassionately, in other words, when the number of victims in need of help is one.

I don’t think this analysis takes anything away from previous examinations of human apathy in the face of mass suffering. I have little doubt that other biases are at work at the same time — we care less for distant lives than we do for lives that are near at hand, and when many people can potentially be of aid, there is a diffusion of responsibility etc. But it seems to me that in the discussions we’ve had about human apathy in the face of mass suffering, the psychological dynamics in our response have received curiously scant attention.

For more information see www.hiddenbrain.org,  www.facebook.com/HiddenBrain, and follow me at www.twitter.com/HiddenBrain



Subscribe to The Hidden Brain

Shankar Vedantam is a science reporter with National Public Radio and a Nieman fellow at Harvard University.

more...