Looking at the results, rather than the causes, of addiction is a mistake. Read More
I believe that almost all addicts are self medicating. I've never met an alcoholic who didn't have a parent who taught them to drink (this is sort of abuse), or a molesting family member/family frient, or who was not neglected. Everyone recognizes PTSD as something that caused drug problem.
Everyone I have met had something happening to them that should not have happened or something that should have happened did not i.e. kid needs love - mom and dad neglect them and a sexually molesting adult.
I believe it is extremely hard if not impossible to turn yourself into an addict unless you have a mental health issue.
I have read 2 of your books and I am starting on the third. I am wondering is your use of the word displacement(as in displaced anger) is the same thing behaviorists mean when they say negative reinforcement or avoidance?
Thank you for your question. I am not a behaviorist but I do not believe the terms you mention are synonymous with displacement. Displacement refers to redirecting some unacceptable feeling or idea from one person or activity to another, often unconsciously. Lady Macbeth suffered a handwashing compulsion which was a displaced expression of her need to undo her crimes by literally washing imaginary blood from her hands. In addiction, the addictive behavior is the displacement, reasserting a needed sense of control in a form that is distant from the original issue (for instance, drinking to reassert power against helplessness rather than taking a direct action to be empowered). It is "avoidance" in the sense that the forbidden or terrifying feeling (such as being more directly aggressive or sexual or close)is kept from awareness and action via this defense mechanism. I don't believe it has any similarity to negative reinforcement.
Thanks for your answer. I do believe that there is a great deal of similarity in the two terms. For instance, negative reinforcement is defined as follows: "In negative reinforcement, a response or behavior is strengthened by stopping, removing or avoiding a negative outcome or aversive stimulus." Steven C. Hayes, who is a behaviorist, and the creator of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has coined the phrase "experiential avoidance" to describe symptoms which allow people to distract themselves from or avoid being conscious their uncomfortable inner experiences. So addiction would be an attempt to use a substance or behavior to avoid the inner experience that creates some type of distress such as feelings like helplessness, rage, etc.
This is a short-sighted article which wildly misses the nature of addiction and human consciouness. As an addict, I was blissfully unaware of the consequences of my addiction ('in denial' in the common parlance of NA), and set about searching for the reasons why I had falling into such a self-destructive pattern, rather than acknowledging the collapse around me. During this search, all the while, I continued to use various drugs at a prolific rate - this is not to say that it was not a useful process for me in the long term, but what I really needed to do was get honest with myself around the consequences of my using. I finally started to do this within NA meetings - THAT was the foundation for the healthy choices that I have started to make in my life over the past four years in recovery, choices that have brought me to a career in counselling, as well as helping me to develop the capacity to be a father, a partner, a friend, and so on. Human nature and addiction includes various levels of consciousness around our choices and the effects of these choices. Part of recovering from an addiction is coming to terms with the impact/consequences of it - ask any one of the millions recovering through AA/NA fellowships how important it was to start recovery with an inventory of the consequences of their drug and alcohol use.
I have commented on Professor's Dodes website blog that I think he misses the point re the consequences of addiction. I'm not going to repeat here what I wrote there - here's the link if you're interested. http://www.lancedodes.com/lance-dodes-blog/2014/3/6/dont-focus-on-the-co...
What I would say is this and I'm quoting myself from an article I wrote about property investment for LandlordZone:
"Physically outwardly people are different and different nationalities each have their own cultures but, other than gender, human beings are basically inwardly the same. When for whatever reason we are emotionally upset at some level, whether consciously or subconsciously, we become psychologically off-balance so will have a propensity that steers us in one direction more than another. It is inclination, a ‘position of comfort’, that is, for example, why people generally only listen to what they want to hear, or don’t take any notice of anything that doesn’t make sense to them. In such a state, warning signals, often subtle, can go unheeded. Often it is only after a tangible symptom is experienced that we take action to remedy the situation in the hope it is not too late to do anything about the underlying problem.
Many people think problems of any sort are normal, but I do not. In my philosophy, a problem is a fault in direction so, essentially, it is not possible to have more than one problem at a time. In reality, having more than one problem at any time is simply fragments of the same underlying problem. Delve and you’ll find a common thread. A problem will not go away of its own accord: it may be swept under the metaphorical carpet, put to the back of your mind, but inevitably it will find a way to attract your attention. You will have to do something about it. The longer the delay, the harder it can get, the more expensive it can become to remedy. The reason problems are direction-related is to enable us and the reality we can create for ourselves to remain in sync with the ups-and-downs of life generally. About how you respond and react to whatever is happening right now, including what you are reading now and thinking about as you go. A problem must be transformed into an opportunity and the more adept you are at doing that as you go the less likely you’ll come unstuck in times of change. As I say, everything in life hinges upon the consequences of two words ‘yes’ and ‘no’. Which means problems can be avoided by taking preventative action. (Word of warning: trying to think of every possibility in advance is likely to leads to nervous breakdown.)"
You can read the full article on LandlordZone - http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/industry-expert-guest-writer/michael-lever...
More information about formatting options
Lance Dodes, M.D., is an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.
When and how should we open up to loved ones?