Sex at Dawn

Exploring the evolutionary origins of modern sexuality.

Who’s Your Daddies?

How could 321 people have 632 fathers?

A recent New York Times editorial reports that “scientists have created baby monkeys with a father and two mothers.” The author of the article, Adam Cohen, considers this “a futuristic twist” to the existing mess concerning the legal status of parenthood when surrogates and DNA manipulation are involved. Cohen wonders, “Could a baby one day have 100 parents?”

Although this certainly seems like a futuristic scenario, dispersed parenthood is more likely  an echo of our pre-agricultural past, still reflected in the practices of some modern-day hunter gatherers.

In her wonderful book, Mother Nature, Sarah Hrdy reports that when anthropologist "Kim Hill asked the Aché who their fathers were, he found he needed to expand his terminology. Three hundred and twenty-one Aché listed a total of 632 fathers.”

How the hell does that happen? Well, the Aché don’t have the purely biological conception of fatherhood we take for granted today. Hrdy explains that, “the Aché have a word, miare, for ‘the father who put it in’; peroare, for ‘the men who mixed it’; momboare, for ‘the ones who spilled it out’; and bykuare, for ‘the fathers who provided the child’s essence.’”

The Aché, like many preagricultural societies, believe a child can have several fathers – literally.

Anthropologists Stephen Beckerman and Paul Valentine edited a book about this phenomenon, which they call “partible paternity.” Cultures of Multiple Fathers contains anthropologists’ reports on this understanding of procreation from many societies in the Amazon basin who have had no contact with one another or any common language – strongly suggesting that partible paternity arose independently in various places and times.

While it seems common-sensical to us that one sex act can result in pregnancy, there’s no reason to think this was so obvious to our ancestors, and plenty of reason to think it wasn’t. Historian Reay Tannahill explains:


The Bellonese of the Solomon Islands, until they were enlightened by Christian missionaries at the end of the 1930s thought that children were sent by their social father’s ancestral deities and that the only function of sexual intercourse was to provide pleasure. In the 1960s, the Tully River Blacks of north Queensland believed that a woman became pregnant because she had been sitting over a fire on which she had roasted a fish given to her by the prospective father…In Papua-New Guinea, the Hua tribe still think a man can become pregnant (by eating possum) and may die in childbirth…


Even Darwin never knew that fertilization was accomplished by a single sperm. In Paleolithic times, pregnancy would have occurred periodically and, as Tannahill explains, “there was no particular reason to wonder how it came about.” But for those who did wonder how it all happened, there was no reason to assume only one man was involved in the process.

Tannahill (1989), Sex in History, p. 42
Hrdy (2000), Mother Nature, pp 246-7.



Subscribe to Sex at Dawn

Christopher Ryan, Ph.D., is co-author of Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality (HarperCollins 2010).

more...