- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topics
- Tests
- Magazine
- Psych Basics
- Blogs
- Diagnosis Dictionary
I have been wondering about the relation between the self-help culture and academic psychology. I attended a one-day seminar on health and realized how different these two cultures are. ALthough I came away with some worthwhile lessons, I found some of the claims and the rhetoric puzzling and even offensive. See my report. Read More













typical
Sounds like this guy is really arrogant. By dismissing your question with the comment, "We could talk about this for a long time," he is telling you: I am above discussing this with you. I think that pretty much sums up the feelings of the self-helpers toward the doctors.
Comfort & Rigour
Good question - where do the self-help & scientific cultures meet, and what, if anything, does each have to offer the other?
Seems to me the two tribes promote somewhat different USPs. The self-helpers go for comfort & the psychological scientists go for rigour. And judging by the sales of books & workshops, ease outsells exactitude by some margin.
Which suggests there are some things scientific psychology could usefully learn from the self-help approach, especially when it comes to engaging people with practical advice and guidance. It's a tricky path to tread but books like the Happiness Hypothesis & The How of Happiness combine both style and substance.
Thanks for sharing your experiences of a different tribe.
Happier (by Tal Ben-Shahar)
Happier (by Tal Ben-Shahar) is another good example of the intersection between academic psychology and self-help. I found the book to be very enjoyable because of the way the author integrated the results of research with his personal experiences.
Hu
Hu is common, garden variety quack. What a shame that he is allowed to feed on the helpless.
Post new comment