- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topic Streams
- Get Help
Mental Health
Addiction
ADHD
Anxiety
Asperger's
Autism
Bipolar Disorder
Depression
Eating Disorders
Insomnia
OCDPersonality
Passive Aggression
Personality
ShynessPersonal Growth
Happiness
Goal Setting
Positive PsychologyRelationships
Low Sexual Desire
Relationships
SexEmotion Management
Anger
Procrastination
StressFamily Life
Adolescents
Child Development
Elder Care
Parenting
SiblingsRecently Diagnosed?
Diagnosis Dictionary
- Magazine
- Tests
- Psych Basics
- Experts
While there is no magical moment at which teenagers immediately engage in reckless abandon, we feel these anecdotes serve to illustrate the epitome of what evolutionary psychologists Margo Wilson and Martin Daly have dubbed, “Young Male Syndrome.” This is a term used to describe the propensity of males, ripened 16 to 24 years, to engage in perilous risk-taking activities, discounting safety, good judgment, and the future. During these years (and in at least one case - ahem - for years after), men feel “invincible” and adopt the “it won’t happen to me” mantra, driving their more reasonable and wiser elders to grow gray hair, wag their fingers, and taunt, “I hope you don’t learn the hard way.” Read More














I wonder how this correlates
I wonder how this correlates with risk taking behavior research by Marvin Zuckerman. It sounds like a judgment call when you already view such acts as "idiotic." Are the researchers themselves high sensation seeking people? How do you explain Danica Patrick and her aggressiveness on the track? As a racer and clinical psychologist I find that this research is rather flawed. My experience with pro drivers are that they are very intelligent as evident by Dr. Keith Johnsgard's research on Grand Prix drivers in the 60s and 70s. If you are at all a very good driver, safety is very important so you can push the limits of the car.
re: Danica Patrick
We would explain Danica Patrick as an outlier.
We don't mean to portray these behaviors (and certainly not these people) as "idiotic" in the low-IQ sense but in the sense that they are irrational and likely to lead to harm. Moreover, we take liberties to adopt a "cheeky" tone when writing our posts and can only hope that we don't offend (note that any denigrations of risk-taking behavior are mostly directed at our own recently consequential acts).
Post new comment