- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topic Streams
- Get Help
Mental Health
Addiction
ADHD
Anxiety
Asperger's
Autism
Bipolar Disorder
Depression
Eating Disorders
Insomnia
OCDPersonality
Passive Aggression
Personality
ShynessPersonal Growth
Happiness
Goal Setting
Positive PsychologyRelationships
Low Sexual Desire
Relationships
SexEmotion Management
Anger
Procrastination
StressFamily Life
Adolescents
Child Development
Elder Care
Parenting
SiblingsRecently Diagnosed?
Diagnosis Dictionary
- Magazine
- Tests
- Psych Basics
- Experts
How can we continue to apply the word dominance to a set of supposedly instinctive behavioral tendencies in dogs and wolves that a) are neither natural nor instinctive, and b) that almost always result in the supposedly dominant animal getting the wrong end of the stick? Read More














What I've Seen with My Dog
I love this because I have what everyone immediately says is a dominant -- alpha -- female. She humps all her friends constantly but when it's time to play, she's on her back, offering her throat. Humping, I've come to believe, is a hundred other things but it's dominance. Not when she's willing to be absolutely prone.
Thanks for your research here.
Very interesting and
Very interesting and convincing, shows how much of behavior that is assumed to be evolutionary can be actually environmental. I think this also applies to the scientific-sounding arguments of evolutionary biology that explains everything from sex to shopping in evolutionary terms. I take issue with the usage of weaker or inferior though, it puts a certain slant on the interaction that leads to other associations. like the female wolf being inferior etc. One may also call that behavior clever, non aggressive or at least refer to one as physically weaker.
Anxiety and aggression are also related in human behavior, aren't they. This way of viewing things can help people see human relationships differently.
Post new comment