Thanks for your comments. I was not actually critiquing or even directly refering to Michael Lewis's book, though I have read it, and found it an interesting profile. Your assumption that I was critiquing that book points to the very issue at hand, the desire for a right answer. What Goop, Michael Lewis, the entire Business, Religious, and General Self Help sections at the airport bookstores risk in common, is a fascination with either finding the one true answer, or, making a fortune trying to do so. All I advise in the piece, is a little bit of balance, and a little less hubris. To your point, social-netwwork media platforms are key to ongoing discussion, refinements, and, even marketing, if that's your bag. But, I just suggest that we look at the questions being asked, the patterns, and not defintiive answers as such, which rot on the vine. Planned obsolence may work for marketing, but it is futile and frustrating in the world of philosophy and psychological evolution. Also, the cool thing about psyhiatry, in the right hands, is that nothing subverts it. It only expands and evolves as a field with new information. Your last jab is an angry, adolescent move. Let it go... And, why would "the little blue pill" (the marketing moniker for Sidenafil or Viagra) make up the world of a psychiatrist? Maybe a Urologist. Unless your going Freudian on me...

Good psychiatry IS creativity, philosophy, enlightenment, and the road to self-knowledge and universal consciousness. Marketing is not. I feel you are fighting your own dragons, not mine; so, I leave you to it.