Leon F. Seltzer recently posted an interesting essay about some of the troubles with testosterone. It's well worth reading, if you missed it. But even Dr. Seltzer (with two Ph.D.s!) is misinformed about human life span in prehistory (a subject we get into at some depth in our soon-to-be-released book). He writes:
Many centuries ago, when our life span was far shorter than it is today, it made good evolutionary sense for us to be ready to conceive as soon as we physically could …. Back then, prior to modern medicine, life was extremely fragile; and so it was clearly adaptive to be able to do "deliver" babies (as, well, "replacements") as promptly as possible.
While this argument may seem to make perfect sense – and represents conventional wisdom on the subject of prehistoric longevity – it's simply wrong that the human "life span" was much shorter then than it is now. "Average longevity" was shorter, but that's something else.

















