- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topic Streams
- Get Help
Mental Health
Addiction
ADHD
Anxiety
Asperger's
Autism
Bipolar Disorder
Depression
Eating Disorders
Insomnia
OCDPersonality
Passive Aggression
Personality
ShynessPersonal Growth
Happiness
Goal Setting
Positive PsychologyRelationships
Low Sexual Desire
Relationships
SexEmotion Management
Anger
Procrastination
StressFamily Life
Adolescents
Child Development
Elder Care
Parenting
SiblingsRecently Diagnosed?
Diagnosis Dictionary
- Magazine
- Tests
- Psych Basics
- Experts
Since one of my favorite things in the whole world is seeing myself on television, I was delighted to receive a call from the producer of a very popular evening program. He wanted me to provide a little balance, he said, during a part of the show that would feature a woman who was bothered by ghosts - and had a videotape to prove it! Read More












Spontaneuous Combustion
Ever seen the movie Spinal Tap? I laugh everytime I hear or see spontaneous combustion. Anyway, I do not see how you can deny such hard evidence (I am joking, by the way).
Thanks for making me smile.
Hello Nathan
And thanks for making me smile in turn.
BTW - I was just reading where 10% of Americans believe we never went to the moon. The Apollo astronauts were just making it up.
Steve
Irrational beliefs??
It is irrational to believe in a JFK assassination conspiracy? Have you done any research? What exactly do you know about the case? My guess is, absolutely nothing. If you had just a smidgeon of understanding of the facts of the case you would know that it is irrational to believe that Oswald acted alone.
Stick to what you know: junk science, inexactitude and alien abductions. Charlatans like you are an impediment in the fight for the truth.
Tim Fleming
http://www.blazingtrailers.com/show.php?title=441
Right on the mark Tim
Right on the mark Tim
Yes, but nonetheless...
I agree with everything you say. Any paranormal event on tape, on any film, on TV, or on audio could be faked. The fact remains that I saw a ghost. Once you do, you can no longer use modern technology to explain everything away, though I remain skeptical on most reports.
Two Responses
Anonymous #1
Why in the world did you feel it was necessary to launch a personal attack? You are certainly free to disagree and to express your JFK conspiracy theory but did you truly feel it was necessary to be abusive and to diminish your position by calling names? I find it difficult to understand such behavior.
Anonymous #2
I too have had a number of weird experiences and on one occasion thought I'd seen the ghost of my wife...only she happened to be very much alive. For the full story, take a look at:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/look-it-way/200903/wired-the-lord
The problem with believing you saw a spirit is that it starts you down a very slippery slope. Once you accept such an explanation, you lose touch with your sense of reason and logic. After that, there's no telling where fantasy and magical thinking will take you.
The problem with believing
The problem with believing you saw a spirit is that it starts you down a very slippery slope. Once you accept such an explanation, you lose touch with your sense of reason and logic. After that, there's no telling where fantasy and magical thinking will take you.
I think your comment above suggests you are on a slippery slope, one that put science and its theories above human experience. Why cant you accept that a person saw an apparition of their dead partner. Oh thats right people that see such things are into "magical thinking", how condescending to make such a comment. This is a typical technique of Skeptics to "shoot the messenger". Obviously anyone who has had such experiences and acknowledges them as real must be delusional in a Skeptics eyes'.
I happen to believe that ufos are a reality and possibly of an alien origin. Therefore I must be nuts eh. Skeptics must be scared of all us crazies out there!
A Slippery Slope Indeed
I saw a ghost once.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/look-it-way/200903/wired-the-lord
And, on another occasion, I was attacked by a UFO.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/look-it-way/200903/seeing-is-believing
The truth is, I've probably come up against as many weird things in my life as you have in yours. The difference between us lies in our belief systems. How do you and I differ in our reaction to something that seems to be supernatural?
My first inclination is to assume that I'm seeing something natural in an unnatural way. That was the case with the UFO. The ghost turned out to be a hypnopompic hallucination. In my belief system, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. It's a reality based approach to life that's just the opposite of a slippery slope. There's no need for magic or mystery, things that go bump in the night or other such woo-woo.
Comment on the JFK part of blog
Apparently Mr. Benedict-Mason is completely oblivious to the HSCA Government report regarding the JFK Assassination which states that the assassination was most likely a part of a conspiracy. It's easier to "see himself on TV" and be overjoyed by making such statements rather than check out the facts first. Might just put him in the catagory of the balloon boy seeking publicity. Study the facts, then perhaps comment.
Richard
Like your friend Tim, you appear to delight in personal attacks. That's unfortunate because it suggests you have little in the way of information to offer. You also seem to believe that anyone who doesn't agree with you is uninformed. That's not true I am well aware of the HSCA report and the fact that the government has two official - but opposite - conclusions regarding conspiracy.
That said, don't you see where your beliefs would have been far better represented had you mentioned the clearly altered autopsy results, the Warren Commission's bias, the magic bullet, Mrs. Odio's testimony, Jack Rudy's polygraph and a dozen other details brought out in the second report? It's funny but I can probably offer a better argument for your side than you have so far managed. When coupled with your inattention to detail (I'm a Dr. not a Mr.) I have to wonder if having you on one's side wouldn't be a detriment.
The bottom line on this is that I'm open to all new and significant findings. Note the word "significant." When legitimate researchers are faced with a plethora of data, but none of it is definitive, it must be assumed the basic hypothesis is illusory. To date, this is the case with UFO's. There are literally thousands of anecdotal accounts of alien space craft but not one single piece of undeniable proof.
This could have been a very interesting Comment's section. It's too bad you decided to go with heat rather than light. However, if there are any other readers who would like to take part in a balanced exchange of ideas, I'd be happy to hear from you.
something to believe in
There is a cheesy Poison song from the eighties called "Something to Believe In." Whenever I hear it, I think the band really struck a chord with human experience. Life is as mundane and easy as it has ever been and people are therefore unhappy and searching for meaning in all the wrong places. I love ghost shows and don't rule out the existance of ghosts but I have yet to see anything compelling enough to believe. Fortunately there are other things in my life that have brought meaning but it took a while for me to find them, and get away from the seduction of a media obsessed with fantasy,in order to embrace them. I believe in love, I believe that hard work pays off, I believe that life isn't meant to be taken too seriously ( hence my enjoyment of ghost shows) and I believe that we don't need to believe in the "super"natural when we have super stuff right here on earth that can bring us just as much of a sense of wonder. Was the moon landing a conspiracy? Hello? people landed on the moon!!! How wonderfully fantastic is that? Do we really need to make it more fantastic by inventing some story?
Hello Again Becky
I think it was Neil Armstong who said that actually going to the moon was far easier than it would have been to create a Gone-to-the-Moon Conspiracy involving something like 400,000 people.
Do you ever wonder if those who don't know a lot are forced to believe a lot?
In any case, thank you for yet another keenly insightful comment. As I said in the past,
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/look-it-way/200905/finally-diet-works
I should ask you to help me write my next piece. You clearly have talent.
Steve
I don't believe in aliens,
I don't believe in aliens, but I still don't get the clue about silly crop circles. Can anybody give me a detail and rational explanation on how these geometrically complex figures are actually made, because I haven't found one sane explanation yet.
They put a strap on a board
They put a strap on a board to hold with their hands and stomp the grass down with the board.
People believe all kinds of stupid things. You can't let it bother you. I know a woman who won't watch her favorite football team play because she thinks it brings them bad luck.
I have heard this
I have heard this explanation, and believe, that it perfectly describes a lot of relatively simple crop circles. However, I have seen some crop circle photos, which show astonishing complexity in design and accuracy in calculation (phoenix crop circle, crop circles displaying complex mathematical functions, etc). Technically it might be possible to create something like that in several days with a plank, if the designer would be a really tallented engineer and used several dozen helpers, but it still remains a mistery, considering bystander evidence of crop circles apearing overnight. Another unexplayned thing is that I have never heard of anybody being caught in the making process, which should be rather common, considering long and tedious work with planks and fact, that many crop circles are visible from the roads.
If I had to explain these most complex circles, I would suggest new military technology, most probably some kind of controlled beams of concentrated energy, eqquiped on the satelites (similar to ones, being developed in unsuccessful missile defence project Star wars, initiated by president Reagan).
Star Wars Revisited
You may be right, of course, but once you get into military technology involving satellites and controlled beams of concentrated energy you find yourself asking more questions than you answer.
Why, for example, would the government draw attention to secret technology in so public a display when they could so easily grow an acre of wheat at a remote testing site and make all the circles they want without raising any suspicion?
Remember Occam's Razor.
Good point about remote
Good point about remote testing site. Either those guys have good sense of humor or they want to test public reaction to "alien stuff" too.
If u are opened many things
If u are opened many things can enter you space...
Keep U Head Open
Crop Circles are simple enough to explain. How would you think they were done? Some boards and some ropes are usually all you need. Indeed, many of the pranksters who made them have come forward and explained exactly how they managed their often spectacular effects.
But the important thing to keep in mind is, even if you can't explain exactly how something was done, that doesn't mean it involved anything paranormal. I can't explain much of what magicians do but I know that magic is nothing more than a clever trick.
Though I must agree with the previous comment:
If u head is open, many things can enter you (sic) space. And being dumb as dirt doesn't hurt...not at all.
make sure to have an open
make sure to have an open mind...but not so open that your brain falls out of your head!
Dragon
Forget about UFOs, ghosts, aliens, crop circles and JFK. Did you know we evolved from Dragons? How else did we start off with Reptilian DNA. Phylogenetically we evolved from Dragons. Yep it's the oldest and most primitive part of our brain. I'm a fire dragon. I like to play with fire. (lol)
bizarre beyond.
Thanks for the article. It scares me as well that so many people believe so strongly in things w/ no physical evidence. I love what Chris Rock said in "Dogma", "It's better to have ideas, it's easier to change your mind than a belief." or something like that.
However, I feel sorry for scientist as well. They're trained to be so logical and rigid their minds are completely closed to certain possibilities.
"Failure to see something only means you failed to see it."
Hello Neosandy
It's true that some scientists appear to be closed to some possibilities but that's not always the case. Indeed most scientists I know are remarkably creative. But I agree with your comment on dogma - it's very scary.
S
Post new comment