- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topics
- Tests
- Magazine
- Psych Basics
- Blogs
- Diagnosis Dictionary
I want to create a new SAT - the Singles Aptitude Test. Think of it as a subversive guide for the single and savvy. Read More
I want to create a new SAT - the Singles Aptitude Test. Think of it as a subversive guide for the single and savvy. Read More
Singles with Attitude Test
I love it! I've even learned a few things...
I have to be nit-picky about the last question, though... Somehow God doesn't seem to fit in there: he's not really a person... Maybe instead of God maybe Ralph Nader would make more sense or Condi Rice. On the other hand, it's an interesting jolt one gets contemplating God as a single guy...
I'll have to ponder additions...
JEE-ZUS
Jesus is always a funny answer and he was a man. I vote for Jesus. Stephen Colbert uses him all the time for a laugh.
Additional Questions
How about turning another of your posts into questions?
Who was Ted Sorensen's great love affair?
A. His wife, Gillian Sorensen
B. His boss, President John F. Kennedy
Not sure about other options since I don't know about Sorensen... (answer is B...)
During the 1800s, who did people express love to?
A. Their sweetheart
B. Their family
C. Their friends
D. All of the above
(Answer is D based on the Coontz quote)
Was thinking the same thing
I, too, was thinking that you could use data from your book to create a "SAT," such as...
According to Study "X," singe individuals generally describe their personal levels of happiness as:
(a) Comparable to married people
(b) Above married people
(c) The same as married people
thanks, D.C.
great -- thanks!
Love your suggestions, Rachel -- thanks! I hear you about the God option. The idea came from the title of one of those little books; it was something like, "Even God is single, so stop giving me a hard time." I do like the jolt part of it.
ha ha!
I read that book too...Hitler was married, and the author wrote something like "married people are clearly not superior." Obviously!
It bothers me that married people are assumed to be more mature than singles. Here is a question based on my own experience:
A 26 year old single woman went to a wedding one weekend. The reception hall was divided into two parts - the more cramped part, segregated from the main room by a narrow doorway and short stairs, was reserved for this population:
A. Children
B. Parents with children
C. Singles
D. Singles and children
The answer is D. The married couples got the good seats in the main room, near the bar and buffet. Single people, apparently synonymous with children, were cast aside, as it felt. Not even the parents of the younger children had to sit back there. Nope, the parents and married couples (even couples who were younger than me!) got to sit in the main room. So we had to deal with the noise and kids running underfoot, as well as the longer trip to the food, bar, etc. Just a tad insulting.
Way too feminacentric
I'm a life-long single and I flunked big. So the test is a bust as far as I'm concerned.
Oh well, I do have an old Mueller cartoon posted on my fridge... it shows an alien who has just landed, and is telling an Earth representative: "If you send Julia Roberts into space, we'll destroy who."
To me it's plausible that women going to chick flicks and reading chick lit *decreases* their "singleness aptitude".
I'm actually proud to be totally ignorant of all things Ken and Barbie...
When I hear people make
When I hear people make comments indicating that those who are married are healthier, better people than those who are single, I like to remind them that Saddam Hussein was a husband and father, while Pope John Paul II was single, childless and celibate. One murdered hundreds of Kurds, the other uplifted and inspired people worldwide.
Post new comment