I am struck by the power of language.
It makes all the difference in a writer's work how ideas are presented. Words can softly lead to engagement and understanding or draw the reader into defensiveness and rejection. The same ideas can be greeted with very different results; it all depends on how. I watch philosophy students repeatedly respond as much to delivery as to the message of what they read. Is the author condescending to those who may disagree? Mocking? Dismissive of any other approach to environmental ethics, human rights, economic priorities? John Stuart Mill, Simone de Beauvoir, and Friedrich Nietzsche make many of the same claims, but their similarities often remain buried under their choice of words and tone of voice. How often do psychologists miss what they share in common due to rigidity of presentation? And we have a deadly display of politicians relying on sound bites laced with an undercurrent of antagonism to address vital issues facing our country today.
- Find a Therapist
- Topic Streams
- Get Help
RelationshipsLow Sexual Desire
Recently Diagnosed?Diagnosis Dictionary
- Psych Basics