How Everyone Became Depressed

The rise and fall of the nervous breakdown

The Backlash Against the New DSM-5

There are a lot of reasons why one might consider DSM-5 a dead end. One is its perpetuation of such diagnoses as “schizophrenia” and “bipolar disorder” that do not in fact correspond to natural disease entities. Read More

nosologic imperialism

Good points, Ned. I can recall observing over 30 years ago what I termed nosologic and then methodologic imperialism associated with DSM-III. First came the nosology accompanied by so-called operational diagnostic criteria, then came the structured interviews tailored to the criteria. That set the stage for checklist diagnoses and the dumbing down of clinical skills in diagnosis. Meanwhile, the vaunted gain in reliability was unimpressive - certainly not worth the price that was paid in weakened validity.

Sign-based diagnostics

Pertti Luukkonen (2014): DSM-5: merkkisysteeminen diagnostiikka
("sign-based diagnostics"). Helsinki: Psykopatologia. - 61 s.
http://granum.uta.fi/granum/kirjanTiedot.php?tuote_id=24264

My book is perhaps the first critical essay on the DSM-5 field
trials.

Sign-based (operational) diagnostics is in principle good, but it
cannot be the ultimate criteria of disorders, only the beginning!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

Edward Shorter, Ph.D., is the Jason A. Hannah Professor in the History of Medicine at the University of Toronto.

more...

Subscribe to How Everyone Became Depressed

Current Issue

Let It Go!

It can take a radical reboot to get past old hurts and injustices.