Freedom to Learn

The roles of play and curiosity as foundations for learning.

How Does School Wound? Kirsten Olson Has Counted Some Ways

In her book "Wounded by School," Kirsten Olson identifies seven ways by which school can produce lifelong wounds. What lasting emotional effects--positive or negative--has school had on you? How is school currently affecting your children or others whom you love? Read More

That's why they call it education

These wounds are exactuly what happens to you once you start working in the real world. So I guess in that way, school is excellent preparation for a job in corporate America.

What is the use in playing victim?

A gentleman with the telling handle "DaddyDrone" wrote (about the sorts of wounds inflicted on people by traditional schools) "These wounds are exactly what happens to you once you start working in the real world. So I guess in that way, school is excellent preparation for a job in corporate America."
He is mistaken. In the US, at least, one may always choose what method(s) one wants to use to take care of one's responsibilities. That answer might be a manufacturing career, a service career, an artistic career; that answer might be to live off the land directly; that answer might be to be entrepreneurial, and to invent a new device or method to deliver goods and services to others of higher quality or lower price; there are as many different answers to the question as there are human beings in the history of the planet.

There are no ways of making one's way in the world that are *innately* terrible (boring, dulling, grinding). There are no ways of making one's way in the world that are *innately* exciting. The challenge is this:
1: To know oneself enough to keep one's sense about what sort of work is fulfilling. Generally it involves finding something that plays to one's strength *and* allows one to work on one's weaknesses, while interacting respectfully with one's colleagues.
2: To retain one's sense of play; recognizing all the while that work and play are *not* opposites -- but flip sides of the same coin. One must go through difficulties and labor to play fully, just as one must 'play' with one's work to work effectively.
3: To remember that life *is* difficult. That there are no guarantees. And that no person outside of you can 'give' you personal fulfillment, any more than a person will simply *give* you the means to support yourself and take responsibility for your use of scarce resources.
3a: It is *not* worth taking employment from a person who does not, fundamentally, view you as an equal -- seeing that you have as much ability and right to walk away from the arrangement as does the employer. You will not work effectively or well, if you feel innately better than or inferior to the employer you are working with.
3b: It is *not* worth hiring a person to do work who does not have a sense of pride and professionalism. If you hire someone (for anything), you want someone who knows that s/he is skilled and capable, and that s/he is innately your equal (rather than your better or your inferior).

In other words, fulfillment in this tragic and imperfect world is mostly dependent on the demeanor we take on when approaching the world.

There is a bright side to living in a tragic world, in which "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." (Genesis 3:19) If we accept and embrace the fact that life is struggle, we can embrace the struggle. We are born ready to take on difficulty -- evolved to struggle. Just as we don't enjoy a basketball game in which there are no real tests of our skill, life is boring when we do not actively test our skills and do our best. When we recognize that our labor is tied to our survival and fulfillment, we can enjoy our labor; and when we allow ourselves to be alienated from our labor, and to talk about our efforts as a "job" that we perform *in*order* to receive wages, it is easy to feel beaten down like DaddyDrone.

Sadly, the reality is that

Sadly, the reality is that many people do have a "job" that they perform in order to receive wages. Many, many people don't have the opportunities or resources to choose between all or even most of the options you mentioned. Not to mention that at least in the US, where health insurance is often tied to employment, having a job can mean the difference between life and death.

yeah I hate it but your

yeah I hate it but your right. School prepares you for working blindly at a job that will do all these same things.

Hello Peter, I think the

Hello Peter,

I think the biggest problem I had from the public school system was the inability to recognize boredom! Until about the mid point in college I pushed myself through the classes in my majors, convinced that I found the material exciting, when in reality I was bored senseless. I was not able to recognize this feeling of boredom. I was so used to drilling and pushing myself through assignments throughout my public school education that I was not able to say STOP I am not interested. Now that I think about, it is dangerous not to be able to recognize boredom and to be convinced that one has to push through material. Looks like it was great preparation to do mindless work and to be convinced that this is acceptable and normal! Another was perfectionism. I do not think I missed any assignment throughout my K-12 education. I came to believe that doing every single task was the norm and was not able to question this assumption that I operated on. When I was in college I began to miss assignments, skip assignments, focus on something I found interesting and leave out other areas. The problem was I had this sense of intense shame and guilt about missing assignments and I could not figure out where it was coming from! I thought the problem was with me. I realize it is necessary to look outside myself and understand the forces that influenced this kind of behavior. How can we teach students to look outside themselves and to understand where these feelings are coming from?

Recognizing boredom

Thanks, anonymous, for this insight. Inability to recognize boredom may be related to the wound of numbness. One simply stops thinking about the question of whether or not a task is interesting or valuable; one just does what is expected. And, as illustrated in your case, numbness and perfectionism often go together, when the perfectionist is no longer distinguishing valuable and interesting tasks from worthless or uninteresting ones. -Peter

boredom

One very spectacular thing that I've noticed about my kids that have never gone to school; they are never bored.

My oldest has said outright that she doesn't even think it's possible to be bored, that she will always find something interesting. I think in part it's personality and in part it's because she's never been to school.

She could be sitting and doing absolutely nothing and NOT be bored.

I remember clearly being bored out of my mind in school plenty of times, just wishing I could be anywhere else but sitting in that chair listening and watching and absorbing what the class was doing.

Bored

My unschooled-from-the-beginning kids get bored. It's easier to switch on the computer or Wii than to be creative or get out a book. They get plenty of technology time, but I feel like they lose something if they aren't allowed to get "bored" without it. Although it's against my philosophy to force them to do what I think is better (not turn on media every time we have a spare minute), I still designate times to be "bored." Actually since I've started saying that we're going to have some "boring time" (i.e. no planned activity and no technology) I've gotten less resistance and fewer complaints of, "I'm bored!"

I was expecting inquisitive children, interested in information, but even at 9 and 6 they seem more interested in being active (parks, playdates, gymnastics, swimming), friends, and technology. I keep waiting for the thirst for information to start up.

Jenny, how do you handle technology in your house? Do you think it's a personality or learning style difference? I know of other kids their age with a strong thirst for knowledge. Mine just don't seem to have much of it yet.

Thirst for information?

KarenW,
You say your kids, age 6 and 9, are into parks, gymnastics, swimming, friends, and technology. My bet is that it's impossible for them to be doing any of this without drinking in a lot of knowledge in the process. It sounds like you have great, healthy kids. Congratulations. What would "thirst for knowledge" look like? -Peter

Pursuing knowledge

A thirst for knowledge to me means pursuing information for information's sake. Curiosity. Asking questions about a topic and then wanting to devour everything in the library about it. I've heard of kids like this. I expected mine to be like that. But that's not what their natural drive for learning looks like right now. Memorizing all the enemies of Mario and how to defeat them and where all the coins are hiding, every single trigger to annoy your brother or sister - yes. Spontaneously wanting to memorize 30 types of butterflies, or multiplication facts, or how clouds form, or info about interesting people - no.

Pursuing life

Thanks, KarenW. I think I understand your point. My own view is that you have nothing to worry about. When I was nine, most of my "pursuit of knowledge" was focused on memorizing the names and batting averages of all the major league baseball players and learning everything I could about how to catch crappies, bass, and pike in the local lake. A few years later it was focused on how to get a certain girl interested in me. Much later, the skills I developed doing those things helped me become a scientist. I never in my life have seen myself as pursuing information for its own sake. To me, that would seem like a waste of time. People are different; yet, if we are allowed to live with our personalities and pursue our own paths, in a healthy environment, we turn out OK. Best wishes, Peter

What does a drive to learn look like?

Karen, my youngest was not openly inquisitive and rarely asked questions. Still doesn't.

For a few years I had to produce portfolios of his 'school year' and had to rearrange my own preconceptions in order to translate what we did, what he did, and what HE learned from it. That's when I learned that Learning and Education are different languages. However, in the end, by age sixteen, what he Learned (quite invisibly to "educational" eyes) turned out to be a Very Measurable Education and then some.

technology

How do I handle technology? I use it. I like having a washer and dryer, a phone, TV, computer, refrigerator, electric lights, etc.

The thing about waiting for thirst of information, is that you are waiting for your kids to meet your definition of what that is. What if their thirst for information is about friends and technology?

There are entire fields and careers based on social sciences and technology.

We have 3 TV's and 5 computers in our house. At this moment, only 2 computers are in use, both by the 2 adults in the house. Both of my kids could use any of those items, or the gaming systems, but neither of them are. One is sitting next to me eating an orange and one is sitting outside in the sunshine with her boyfriend.

Later today there will be a house full of teenagers. At some point they will likely watch movies or play video games or both, or they may all end up going to the forest next to our house or a bit of all of that. In any case, they will be choosing each of those activities and none of them will be chosen out of boredom. Their conversations will be engaging, the chalk board will be filled with drawings, the fridge magnets will spell out vaguely naughty things, and lots and lots of jokes will be played and told. They will eat all our food and most of them will sleep (or not) here in the living room and in the bedroom depending on where they all fit.

As I was writing this, the younger child put Dr Who on and is watching that. The paradox of time travel can create stimulating conversation! Watching TV can be mind expanding!

I think this list is

I think this list is remarkably thorough, accurate, and poignant. I was a model student. I expended so much effort into getting good grades and appearing “well rounded” that I didn’t have the time or energy to learn anything beyond what was required for the test or to explore and develop my own interests and abilities. I had no idea what I cared about or what my interests might be. I think this vagueness and the sense that I was one of the dull, insignificant people had negative consequences for my working life and the kinds of career choices I made.
As a student, I was docile on the outside and seething—bored, sad, anxious—on the inside. Now in my 50s, I have begun in the last several years to study subjects I have always wanted to learn about and to develop many new interests. This makes me feel alive in a way that school never did. I wish I had respected this independent streak when I was younger instead of keeping it hidden. I have always had great intellectual curiosity and feel I would have been better off with a tutor, who would have respected and nurtured that quality.
It was interesting to read yesterday’s Room for Debate column in the New York Times, on whether school librarians are still needed. I think a library is far more likely than a classroom to foster a love of learning. When I speak with friends and family who are readers about what inspired them, no one talks about memorizing material for exams, competing with peers, or spending hours on homework assignments. They do talk about the freedom and excitement of exploring books in a library or at home, sometimes with the encouragement and guidance of a sympathetic adult.
Thank you for this column. I look forward to reading the book.

I agree with you. I didn't

I agree with you. I didn't regain my love of learning until I started homeschooling my children 6 years ago. I will be 50 next month. We recently enrolled our daughters at a new charter school, then un-enrolled them after the orientation! School hours will be 7:15am - 4:55pm; not allowed to miss school, even for a doctor appt., plus de-merits for your school uniform shirt being untucked...it was very rigid. Plus we were told to expect one hour + of homework every night. Can you say burnout?

1 Hour of homework can lead to burnout?

Wow. I used to spend at least 3 hours on homework every single day from the time I was in 1st grade. And even more time on 'private tuition', practice assessments etc. Did I burn out?

Not really. Maybe parents are underestimating their kids.

Or maybe...

...you're assuming that all kids enjoy or thrive or even benefit from 10 hours of schooling every day. Like you, some do, it's true, and they should be free to pursue that style of learning. But for the many who don't, it destroys opportunities for learning.

It's not about underestimating what kids are capable of, it's about assessing each child's methods of learning and adjusting accordingly.

Burnout

Les & DeviousDiv, my own view is that it's not so much about "assessing each child's methods of learning and adjusting accordingly" as is about letting children have lots of time to play and explore freely, so they can discover and develop their own interests in their own ways. -See my July 2010 post, The Dramatic Rise of Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: Is It Connected to the Decline in Play and Rise in Schooling? -Best, Peter

Thanks, Peter, I'll

Thanks, Peter, I'll definitely read that. It's funny, because I thought I was being rather radical, but my years of teaching still hold sway, as my statement implied a larger (nearly omnipotent) role for the adult in a child's learning process than for the child!

I've been homeschooling my son for 8 years, now, and I've slowly been giving him more and more "freedom to learn" on his own, while working through the anxieties this important process has created within my wife and myself. Your writings help alleviate that anxiety. Thanks very much.

I wish you well

Les, thank you for this comment. My experience, when I finally decided to give up control and let my son truly take full charge of his own education, was one of wonderment. It was such a delight to be an observer and beneficiary of his learning and to recognize that I did not have to worry about this at all or be responsible for it. This has been the experience of many many others I know who learned to give up the attempt at control. Best wishes, Peter

School librarians...

Thank you for adding your voice to the value of school librarians. I couldn't agree with you more. I have witnessed the elimination of school librarian positions for economic reasons without any consideration given to impact of those decisions. The major force behind those decisions involved financing the staffing needs to help the school population achieve adequate yearly progress. Many schools have already eliminated the positions of school librarians. This unintended outcome of NCLB is another wound that our children will bear.

Librarians as model teachers

In my ideal system of education, all teachers would be librarians or like librarians. They would respond to students' (patrons') expressed needs and interests rather than coerce them to learn what they don't want to learn. They would be true facilitators of self-directed education. See my Sept., 2009, post: Our Social Obligation Toward Children’s Education: Opportunities, Not Coercion. Best, Peter

wounds of school

I was an average student( in Germany) and almost failed a grade 2 times. I didn't like school very much, but it got a little better when I got older and changed to a school that had an emphasis on music, which I love. But even from that education I don't remember much. So I'm so glad that I can encourage my own childrens creativity and love for learning through homneschooling and also forster my own love for learning,although I don't have much time to go to deep into it.

The wounds

As a teacher and a student - the 'Wounds of Underestimation' and the 'Wounds of Perfectionism' are the most damaging. Underestimating a student destroys initiative and perfectionism destroys the learning process because it tears down the positives of failure.

I tell my students that a test is just a snapshot in time, it tells you where you are right now, while you are taking a test. It tells you nothing else, and you can always change how much and what you know.

I would add "The wound of indifference"

School teaches students that all learning is boring and pointless. It makes every endeavor a chore. I learned this lesson by high school - though I was an early and avid reader, by the time I was 14, I was so tired of having good books destroyed by English class that I decided in advance that any book we had to read would be awful. I distinctly remember hating Huckleberry Finn and fighting my teacher all the way. 20 years later, I love Mark Twain. I see this with almost all young people I meet - they consider all learning to be awful and this, in turn, creates the attitude that intelligent or educated people are "pointy-headed" and contributes to the coarsening of our national cultural and political discourse. Rather than being forced to learn a series of pointless facts, children need to learn that naturally pursuing one's interests via self-motivation is one of the greatest joys there is.

The irony of our culture's two-sided view of education

Anonymous, you have implicitly pointed out an irony in our culture's attitude about education. On the one hand, we keep demanding more and more schooling, more and more testing, more and more accountability on the part of teachers to see to it that children learn something. On the other hand, we have scorn for those who actually do learn something and retain intellectual enthusiasm, who become "pointy-headed" intellectual. Somehow, as a culture, we have the idea that it's supposed to be a battle, in which teachers try to make children learn and children resist it. Hmmm. -Peter

judging

When I was in Elem/Middle school, I sought approval from teachers (including my private piano teacher) and wanted to do well (ie - get good grades, awards, etc.) I was praised and praised for this and encouraged to continue on that path. At some point though, I began to fear failure (in my mind mediocrity = failure... failure at being "the best" I could be). I began to fear "messing up" (in school as well as piano competitions/recitals), which affected my performance! I was still a pretty good student, but I absolutely didn't try "my best" to get good grades. If you aren't trying your best, you're not devastated when you make a mistake. I skated by in high school -- got mostly B's with some A's and C's thrown in. I was still a pretty good pianist, but skipped some competitions and recitals I was recommended for b/c I was afraid I'd not be as good as I was expected to be.

I went to college to be a teacher b/c I hoped that I could be THAT teacher that encouraged kids and who tried new and exciting things. Unfortunately, I didn't find teaching in the public school system allowed me freedom to try creative things in my classroom. I was expected to do exactly what the administration wanted me to do -- test, quiz, give worksheets, give writing assignments, etc, to determine grades -- in a performance based music class!

Now I'm home and an Unschooling mom and so happy that my kids aren't subjected to the wounds of traditional school.

Yes, judging is the core of the problem

QandEsMom, thanks for this contribution. I agree. the constant evaluation of students that occurs at school is the core of the problem. Fear of failure is the inevitable result for those who take the judging seriously (while rebellion is the inevitable result for those who don't), and fear of failure always interferes with creativity and learning. -Peter

judgement scars

I felt the wound of perfectionism in primary school as a gifted student, constantly being judged under a microscope by teachers while being alienated by other "average" students. Burnt out and filled with self-loathing, I gave up and turned to rebellion and apathy in high school. Although I was again an excellent student in college, as an adult I lack the motivation or confidence, not sure which, to pursue a career. Now the mother of a 2 year old, I see the great benefit of teaching my child in a loving family environment where she can make her own choices and blossom as a happy human being in a nonjudgmental setting.

a few other wounds

I write about these seven wounds and a few more in my book Free Range Learning.

There are also many wounds of disconnection. Schoolwork separates what is deemed "educational" from the rest of the young child's experience. Subject matter in school, even when taught well, tends to be indirect, inactive, removed from the fibers that connect it to everything else. A divide appears where before curiosity and motivation were present. Now absorption and play are on one side, in opposition to work and learning on the other. This sets the inherent joy in learning adrift. The energy that formerly prompted a child to explore, ask questions, and eagerly leap ahead becomes a social liability. Wholeness is lost.

Wounds of disconnection from the body. The schoolchild is confined indoors and most often kept seated. Throughout the day the focus is largely on his or her brain, in fact, largely one hemisphere of the brain. This is what is challenged and graded. But learning can't be separated from the body. Movement informs understanding, particularly proprioception and kinesthetic awareness necessary to every person's development. "Sit still and pay attention" ignores the vital ways children encode learning. Even unrelated physical activity leads to bodily fitness, which is directed related not only to health but also to greater comprehension across a range of academic areas.

Wounds of disconnection from family, from elders, from the community. Throughout most of human history children have matured while observing, imitating, and playing in proximity to people of all ages---people they know and trust. They haven't been confined to peer relationships where the models for behavior and reasoning are limited to people of the same age. Peer friendships are, of course, vital, but peer culture without the tempering influence of strong role models of all ages often lean toward cynicism, cruelty, and exclusion.

Wounded students do learn, but not necessarily what they're taught. They learn to be frustrated. They learn boredom, passivity, judgment. They learn to quell independent thought. They don't let their whole selves bubble up in art, or real questions, or curiosity. Gradually the natural moment-to-moment curiosity of a child is distorted until they resist learning anything but what they "have" to learn. Then the life force is drained from education.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

Subscribe to Freedom to Learn

Peter Gray, Ph.D., a research professor of psychology at Boston College, is a specialist in developmental and evolutionary psychology and author of an introductory textbook, Psychology.

more...