I have a particular fondness for the story of Hansel and Gretel. First, there is that soul-warming image of sibling love and protection. Second, there's that feisty young girl, who scouts out every plot against her, solves every problem, and saves her brother. Third, there's that underlying justification of dislike for the step-mother which, for reasons I won't go into, strikes a chord in me. But recently, I've been challenged to re-think this fairy tale. A novel by Fay Weldon, The Step-Mother's Diary, takes a new look at the familiar conflict between step-daughter and step-mother. Novelists and playwrights are often ahead of psychologists in identifying templates of unconscious emotion, and Weldon's chilling re-location of the wickedness in this relationship lhas got me wondering whether Gretel was really so innocent, after all.
Time and time again we are reminded that there is more than one "normal" family structure, but a new register of patterns to mark out common dynamics has been slow to establish itself. Now that families where at least one parent is a stepparent is so common (in the US 8% of children live with a step-parent), it is high time to reconsider the meanings of "stepmother". The associations of "stepmother" with mean, grudging and excluding behaviour have ancient roots in fairytales, and are a source of fascination for psychologists. Bruno Bettelheim believed that the harsh features of the step-mother were shaped by the ambivalence towards the biological mother; the wicked step-mother represented unconscious hatred, fear and resentment towards the mother, who was also loved and idealized. So incompatible were these two images, that the unconscious split them apart, and presented one as the good real mother, and the other as the bad woman who usurped the good mother.

















