- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topic Streams
- Get Help
Mental Health
Addiction
ADHD
Anxiety
Asperger's
Autism
Bipolar Disorder
Depression
Eating Disorders
Insomnia
OCDPersonality
Passive Aggression
Personality
ShynessPersonal Growth
Happiness
Goal Setting
Positive PsychologyRelationships
Low Sexual Desire
Relationships
SexEmotion Management
Anger
Procrastination
StressFamily Life
Adolescents
Child Development
Elder Care
Parenting
SiblingsRecently Diagnosed?
Diagnosis Dictionary
- Magazine
- Tests
- Psych Basics
- Experts
There is nothing more revolting than eating lobster. And I am not referring to the weird situation of taking a living creature and boiling it alive for our gustatory amusement. Read on and you'll see what I mean... Read More













No, thank you.
Based on the title, I expected you to go on to explain how lobsters are giant meaty bottom-feeding insects that smell like fish. A fleshy cockroach with claws and a visible poop track splayed out on your dinner plate, straight from hoovering the detritus of the sea. But no. I hear some people even put lobster in their mouths. To each his own.
Context & Change
As you pointed out knowledge is only useful in a given context. I just had two brief thoughts about that:
(1) Over simplification & over generalization are two ways of over expanding the contextual validity of a given set of knowledge. The vanity of trying to create "neat" models of the world we live in.
(2) Change is an important factor that is not given much room within over simplified knowledge models. There are less changeable components and each evolutionary step would be radical. Complex models on the other hand have man rough edges that may easily lend themselves to change. (maybe not paradigm shift)
Post new comment