Anonymous comments on blogs are common and occasionally I respond to them. Every once in a while, the person posts again, in response to my additional comment.
I enjoy conversations and relish dialogue. But I have a policy that I won't engage someone online who wouldn't reveal his or her name. To me this is like talking to a person wearing a mask. (Regarding not being able to see a person's face, see my comments about the niqab at http://arthurdobrin.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/covering-the-face/)
A reader rebuked me for my position, saying, "If you need identities to engage in civil discourse, the internet is not for you. I suggest you take to another medium to espouse your ideas."
I do use other outlets to present my ideas, but should different standards apply, as my erstwhile interlocutor maintains? I haven't been blogging long enough to know the protocol, so perhaps Anonymous is correct about what is acceptable in the blogosphere. However, I think newspapers are right in not printing anonymous letters and posting this way on the Internet, it seems to me, should be no different.















