- Home
- Find a Therapist
- Topics
- Tests
- Magazine
- Psych Basics
- Blogs
- Diagnosis Dictionary
John Edwards, while publicly confessing last Friday an affair he had insistently and repeatedly denied, at the same time announced this should put an end to all discussion of the matter. Yet his confession has revealed any number of holes. Despite claiming the affair was due to his self-regard and arrogance, traits which he has presumably addressed, his behavior indicates his narcissism has crescendoed to psychotic dimensions. How scary is this about the people who would be our president? Read More
What does this say about candidates for President?
The reason that McCain is so quiet about this is because while HIS wife was recovering from an auto accident he was stepping out with the woman who is now his current wife.
It says that anyone who is vetting a VP should be OH SO CAREFUL about a politician who is willing to cover anything to get the job.
The great presidents have all had sexual exploits just off stage. Grow up! Men are men are men and will always have this going on in the background.
oh please
But I thought you said he made the whole thing up to cover up his homosexuality.
We get it: you don't like John Edwards. Please remember that this is Psychology Today, and blogs should have valuable input on some aspect of psychology. This is no place for you to publicly speculate about a man's sexuality or private family business. Get over it and find something worthwhile to write about.
Rielle Hunter apparently
Rielle Hunter apparently suffers from BPD herself.
Where does Hillary fit in?
Why is John Edwards still news?
The paternity test will be ordered by a judge when Rielle Hunter files for child support. That's how its done.
It's a tale about Obama and Elizabeth, the brains of the operation. John Edwards' sex fling is news because Obama knew it to be true and still wanted him on the VP list, up to just a few days ago. This is how government figures get blackmailed...of course, Edwards is already paying about $15000 in blackmail (via an associate) to keep Rielle from telling the truth to the world...you see, John is not the story, it's about Elizabeth...Elizabeth Edwards was supposed to speak at the DNC in Denver...money was paid to suppress the scandal until after the convention...but, obviously, the National Enquirer paid better. Also, if Elizabeth knew in 2006, then why would Elizabeth subject the Democratic Party to such a risk by letting her fornicating husband run for the nomination...simple, Elizabeth did it to draw votes away from Hillary...how Elizabeth stole Hillary's nomination is the real story.
Post new comment