Sandra and Marisa Pena, identical twins, seem to be
exactly the same. They have the same thick dark hair, the same high
cheekbones, the same habit of delicately rubbing the tip of the nose in
conversation. They had the same type of thyroid cyst at the same age (18)
in the same place (right side). When San Diego is mentioned, they both
say, simultaneously and with the same intonation, "Oh, I love San Diego!"
They live together, work one floor away from each other at MTV, wear the
same clothes, hang out with the same friends. They even have the same
The sisters are as alike as two people can be. At the same time,
they are opposites. Sandra is outgoing and confident; Marisa is reserved.
They have the same pretty face, but those cheekbones make shy Marisa look
mysterious and brooding, while Sandra looks wholesome and sweet. Sandra
tends to speak for her sister: "Marisa's always been more quiet, more
subdued, an introvert"; Marisa nods her assent. They see themselves as a
duo—but more like complementary photo negatives rather than duplicates
of each other. "I think we balance each other out," says Sandra.
"Definitely," Marisa chimes in. Sandra begins, "In every family photo,
I'm smiling, she's"—"I'm not," Marisa says with a laugh.
When their father passed away in 1994 from pancreatic cancer
and their mother died soon after, the deeper differences between the two
became obvious. Their family had been very loving and protective, and the
sisters were traumatized by the sudden loss. But as Marisa sank into a
depression, Sandra picked up and changed her life. She left San Antonio
for Germany to live with her boyfriend. Marisa stayed put, catatonic with
sadness. It was the first time the two had ever been apart.
Then, after a few months in Germany, Sandra headed to New York
City—the buzzing metropolis in which she had dreamed of living since she
was a teenager. Marisa soon followed Sandra, but when she arrived in New
York, "She just couldn't let go of [her sadness]," says Sandra. "I didn't
know what to do with her."
We've come to believe that genes influence
character and personality more than anything else does. It's not just
about height and hair color—DNA seems to have its clutches on our very
souls. But spend a few hours with identical twins, who have exactly the
same set of genes, and you'll find that this simplistic belief crumbles
before your eyes. If DNA dictates all, how can two people with identical
genes—who are living, breathing clones of each other—be so
To answer such questions, scientists have begun to think more
broadly about how genes and life experience combine to shape us. The
rigid idea that genes determine identity has been replaced with a more
flexible and complex view in which DNA and life experience conspire to
mold our personalities. We now know that certain genes make people
susceptible to traits like aggression and depression. But susceptibility
is not inevitability. Gene expression is like putty: Genes are turned on
and off, dialed up or down both by other genes and by the ups and downs
of everyday life. A seminal study last year found that the ideal breeding
ground for depression is a combination of specific genes and stressful
triggers—simply having the gene will not send most people into despair.
Such research promises to end the binary debate about nature vs.
nurture—and usher in a revolution in understanding who we are.
"While scientists have been trying to tease apart environmental
from genetic influences on diseases like cancer, this is the first study
to show this effect [for a mental disorder]," says Thomas Insel, director
of the National Institute of Mental Health. "This is really the science
of the moment."
New technological advances made it possible to
quickly identify human genes. That breakthrough launched a revolution in
human biology—and in psychiatry. Not only were scientists rapidly
discovering genes linked to illnesses such as cancer and birth defects
like dwarfism, they also found genes associated with such traits as
sexual preference and aggression as well as mental illnesses such as
Genetic discoveries transformed the intellectual zeitgeist as well,
marking a decisive shift from the idea that environment alone shapes
human personality. Nurture-heavy theories about behavior dominated in the
1960s and 1970s, a reaction in part to the legacy of Nazi eugenics. By
the 1990s, the genome was exalted as "the human blueprint," the ultimate
dictator of our attributes. Behavioral geneticists offered refreshingly
simple explanations for human identity—and for social problems. Bad
parenting, poor neighborhoods or amoral television didn't cause bad
behavior; genes did. No wonder all those welfare programs weren't
"People really believed that there must be something exclusively
genetically wrong with people who are not successful. They were exhausted
with these broken-hearted liberals saying that it's all social," says
Andreas Heinz, professor of psychiatry at Humboldt and Freie University
in Berlin, who has been studying the influence of genes and environment
on behavior for years. The idea that violent behavior in particular might
be genetically "set" was so accepted that in 1992, the director of the
agency overseeing the National Institute of Mental Health compared urban
African-American youth with "hyperaggressive" and "hypersexual" monkeys
in a jungle.
Genetic explanations for behavior gained ground in part through
great leaps in our understanding of mood disorders. In the early 1990s,
research at the federal labs of Stephen Suomi and Dee Higley found that
monkeys with low levels of serotonin—now known to be a major player in
human anxiety and depression—were prone to alcoholism, anxiety and
aggression. Around the same time, Klaus-Peter Lesch at the University of
Wuertzburg in Germany identified the serotonin transporter gene, which
produces a protein that ferries serotonin between brain cells. Prozac and
other drugs work by boosting levels of serotonin in the brain, so this
gene seemed like an obvious target in the search for the genetic roots of
Lesch, who was working on the connection between this gene and
psychiatric disorders, later found that people who had at least one copy
of the short version of this gene were much more likely to have an
anxiety disorder. Short and long versions of genes function much like
synonymous words: Different lengths, or "spellings," generate subtle but
critical differences in biology.
Despite these groundbreaking insights, it quickly became clear that
complex human behaviors couldn't be reduced to pure genetics. Apart from
a few exceptions, scientists couldn't find a gene that directly caused
depression or schizophrenia or any other major mental or mood disorder.
The new research also failed to answer a lot of common-sense questions:
If identical twins are genetically indistinguishable, how could just one
end up schizophrenic or homosexual? And it couldn't address subtler
questions about character and behavior. Why do some people bounce back
from terrible trauma that shatters others? Why are some people ruthlessly
ambitious and others laid-back?
Thanks to misfit monkeys like George, a rhesus macaque living in a
lab in Maryland, researchers have clues to the missing element. In most
ways, George is a typical male monkey. He's covered in sandy fur and has
a rubbery, almost maniacal grin. But a couple of things set George apart.
After he was born, Higley and Suomi's team separated George from his
mother, raising him instead in a nursery with other macaque infants his
own age. George has another strike against him: a short version of the
serotonin transporter gene (monkeys, like people, can have either a short
form or a long form of the gene).
But the most notable thing about George is that he is an alcoholic.
Each day, George and his simian chums have happy hour, with alcohol
freely available in their cage for one hour. Unlike his buddies, George
drinks like the resident barroom lush—he sways and wobbles and can't
walk a straight line.
And his problems go beyond the bottle. He's reluctant to explore
new objects, and he is shy around strangers. He always seems to be on
edge and tends to get aggressive and impulsive quickly. In short, he's a
completely different animal from his cousin Jim, who also has the short
version of the transporter gene but was raised by his biological mom.
Jim's "normal" upbringing seems to have protected him from the gene: This
monkey is laid-back and prefers sugar water to booze.
After studying 36 family-raised monkeys and 79 nursery-raised
animals, the team found that the long version of the gene seems to help
the animals shrug off stress. The short form of the gene, by contrast,
doesn't directly cause alcoholism: Monkeys with the short gene and a
normal family upbringing have few personality problems. But the short
version of the gene definitely puts the animals at a disadvantage when
life gets tough. Raised without the care and support of their mothers,
their predisposition toward anxiety and alcoholism comes to the
"Maternal nurturing and discipline seem to buffer the effect of the
serotonin gene," says Suomi. "If they don't have good mothers, then the
[troubled] behavior comes out loud and clear."
The implications of this research are tantalizing, since people
also carry long and short versions of the transporter gene. These
variants, unlike those that have been identified as making people
susceptible to diseases like breast cancer or Alzheimer's, are very
common: Among Caucasians, about one-fifth of the population has two
copies of the short gene (everyone gets one copy from Mom and the other
from Dad), and another third have two copies of the long gene. The rest
have one of each. (The gene has not yet been studied in other
populations.) The evidence indicated that this gene was related to
resilience and depression in humans. Why, then, had researchers thus far
failed to find a convincing correlation between the gene and the risk of
Terrie Moffitt and Avshalom Caspi, a husband-and-wife team of
psychologists at King's College in London, had the insight that
environmental influences might be the missing part of the puzzle. Moffitt
and Caspi turned to a long-term study of almost 900 New Zealanders,
identified these subjects' transporter genes and interviewed the subjects
about traumatic experiences in early adulthood—like a major breakup,
death in the family or serious injury—to see if the difficulties brought
out an underlying genetic tendency toward depression.
The results were striking: 43 percent of subjects who had the short
genes and who had experienced four or more tumultuous events became
clinically depressed. By contrast, only 17 percent of the long-gene
people who had endured four or more stressful events wound up
depressed—no more than the rate of depression in the general population.
People with the short gene who experienced no stressful events fared
pretty well too—they also became depressed at the average rate. Clearly,
it was the combination of hard knocks and short genes that more than
doubled the risk of depression.
Caspi and Moffitt's study was one of the
first to examine the combined effects of genetic predisposition and
experience on a specific trait. Psychiatrists were delighted. "It's just
a wonderful story," says Insel. "It changed the way we think about genes
and psychiatric disorders."
Moffitt and Caspi have found a similar relationship between another
gene and antisocial behavior. Abused and neglected children with a gene
responsible for low levels of monoamine oxidase in the brain were nine
times more likely to engage in violent or other antisocial behavior as
adults than were people with the same gene who were not mistreated.
Finnish scientists have since found similar effects on genes for novelty
seeking—a trait associated with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder. Children who had the genes and who were also raised by strict,
emotionally distant parents were much more likely to engage in risky
behavior and make impulsive decisions as adults than children with the
same genes who were raised in more tolerant and accepting
While scientists don't exactly know how genes are influenced by
environment at the molecular level, there are clues that genes have the
equivalent of molecular "switches" and can be programmed—turned on or
off, up or down—very early. Both Lesch and Suomi have shown that the
level of biochemicals such as the serotonin transporter molecule can be
"set" as early as in the womb, at least in mice and monkeys.
The prenatal environment also has a major influence on differences
between identical twins. Mothers of multiples will tell you that their
babies were distinct the moment they were born, and research backs them
up. Twins experience different environments even in the womb, as they
compete with each other for nutrients. One can beat out the other, which
is why they often have different birth weights: Marisa Pena was born
first and is a bit taller and heavier than her sister.
Prenatal experiences are just the first in a lifetime of
differentiating factors. Only about 50 percent of the characteristics
twins have in common are due to genes alone. Researchers now believe that
an illness suffered by only one twin, or different amounts of attention
from peers or parents, can set the stage for personality differences.
This makes it easier to understand why the Pena sisters reacted as they
did: By the time their parents died, "these twins had had a lifetime of
experiences which might have made them react differently," says Moffitt.
"In addition, some pairs of identical twins individuate themselves in
early childhood. They seem to take on the roles of 'the shy one' and 'the
outgoing one' and then live up to those roles." In other words, they
customize their environment, and the world treats them
The new science of nature and nurture isn't as straightforward as
the DNA-is-destiny mantra, but it is more accurate. "People have a really
hard time understanding the probabilistic nature of how genes impact
traits like depression," says Kenneth Kendler, director of the Virginia
Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics at Virginia
Commonwealth University, who heads a major twin registry. "They think
that if something is heritable, then it can't be modified by the
environment." The knowledge that the traits we inherit are also
contingent on what the world does to us promises more insight into why
people act and feel differently—even when they look exactly the