People may lie when asked if they use pornography or drugs, but they are less apt to do so when questioned by a machine.
By
Chris Jozefowicz, published on September 01, 2003 - last reviewed on June 30, 2005
People may lie when asked if they use pornography or drugs, but
they are less apt to do so when questioned by a machine.
Using phone interviews, men and women were questioned by either a live
person, a recorded human voice or a machine-like voice. The study was conducted by
Mick Couper, an adjunct associate professor of sociology at the University of
Michigan.
Subjects admitted to more stigmatized behaviors -- such as buying or
renting pornography and smoking marijuana -- when they dealt with a recorded
or synthetic voice. It didn't matter how human-like the voice was or
whether it sounded male or female: The mere absence of a real person
appears to prompt disclosure. Some participants known to have declared
personal bankruptcy were also asked about their bankruptcy history.
Nearly 20 percent denied having declared bankruptcy to a live
interviewer, while less than 10 percent lied to a machine.
Twenty to 25 percent of participants hung up, regardless of whether
a recorded or computer-generated voice gave the survey.
But don't expect a swarm of silicon solicitations just yet. All
calls made in the study began with a live interviewer. Calls initiated
and conducted by a machine may be much less effective. "Even I hang up on
them all the time," Couper says, "and I am a survey researcher."
Tags:
adjunct associate professor,
bankruptcy history,
computer,
computer generated voice,
human voice,
interview,
interviewer,
live person,
lying,
mick couper,
personal bankruptcy,
phone interviews,
pornography,
real person,
researcher,
silicon,
smoking marijuana,
sociology,
solicitations,
stigma,
swarm,
synthetic voice,
university of michigan
