Predicting who will use or abuse authority is not as easy as you think.
You may see shades of Napoleon in your boss, even if his behavior is more docile than despotic. Greg J. Gold, Ph.D., an assistant psychology professor at Humboldt State University in California, found that subordinates over-predict supervisors use of "harsh" power tactics, such as coercion, as opposed to "soft" or rewarding incentives.
Gold randomly assigned 133 subjects to high- or low-status positions, then asked them whether they'd employ harsh or soft tactics to influence those at the opposite end of the spectrum. He also asked 141 college freshmen and seniors which tactics they'd use and which tactics freshmen expected seniors to use, to persuade the opposite group to lend them class notes. Gold's results were presented at an American Psychological Association meeting.
"Common wisdom has taught us that people self-select into leadership or subordinate roles based on their personality style," says Gold. "The belief is that those who seek higher status positions also favor harsh influence tactics."



