There's a limit to what online communication can relay
about personality. A person's gender can be detected, but not much more.
By
W. Eric Martin, published on November 01, 2001 - last reviewed on April 07, 2006
If you think you have a firm "read" on someone's personality from
an e-mail exchange, think again: Two studies found that little more
than a person's gender can be accurately predicted.
Research has established that women are more likely than men to ask
questions, make self-denigrating comments and reference emotions. In
contrast, men issue more opinions, grammatical errors and insults.
A study by Rob Thomson and Tamar Murachver of the
University of Otago in New Zealand, found that these traits are easily
detected online: The 35 subjects correctly identified the sex of the
author of non-gender specific e-mail messages more than 90 percent of the
time. Language style, rather than subject matter, is the giveaway. "If a
woman talks about a male-stereotypical topic, like rugby, without
changing her style, readers will still think she's female," explains
Thomson, whose findings were published in the British Journal of Social
Psychology.
But identifying more nuanced personality traits is another matter
entirely, according to Steven Rouse, assistant professor of
psychology at Pepperdine University in California. Rouse asked 82
students to complete a personality test and then spend two hours online
playing a word game and chatting with the other players. He gave
transcripts of these chat-room discussions to a new group of students and
asked them to rate specific individuals' behavioral traits such as
extraversion, openness and neurosis.
"There was almost no agreement between a person's personality test
scores and the [chat-room-based] ratings," explains Rouse. And an
individual's personality test gave little clue as to what they actually
did in the chat room.
Ironically, raters accurately "decoded" an individual's chat-room
comments, but those comments were only marginally related to the
individual's true personality. "People who read what a person wrote in a
chat room formed very inaccurate perceptions of that person, because they
were using behavioral cues—like complimenting and greeting—not
relevant to the person's personality traits," says Rouse.
Tags:
behavioral traits,
british journal of social psychology,
e mail,
friendship,
grammatical errors,
insults,
language style,
mail exchange,
mail messages,
online,
pepperdine university,
personality,
personality test,
personality traits,
room discussions,
s chat room,
time language,
true personality,
university of otago,
woman talks,
word game