The cruise ship business is booming as never before. People who
have seen thefilm Titanic are booking passage on every cruise in every
direction. A consortium is reportedly constructing a replica of the great
ocean liner, its maiden voyage scheduled for 2002. With the movie having
grossed about a billion dollars worldwide and sales and rentals of the
Titanic video to be released this September sure to bring in millions
more, the builders expect their reconstruction to be in infinite demand.
Something is being searched for, en masse, upon the high seas.
Excuse me, but--didn't the ship sink?
The film opens with eerie footage of the real drowned liner and
closes with gruesome reconstructed scenes of passengers plummeting down
the ship's listing decks and survivors freezing to death in the icy
Atlantic, crying futilely for rescue by passengers safe in roomy
lifeboats. Not sights to inspire a rush on sea cruises. Yet viewers see
an "unsinkable" ship sinking and 1500 people cruelly dying, and
breathlessly book passage for a cruise.
The only possible conclusion? They didn't see a ship sink. Or
rather: the ship that went down--and the hundreds with her--were so
peripheral to what they were really watching that the disaster itself
carried not an ounce of emotional weight. All that they saw, and all that
the filmmakers intended for them to see, was what someone, somewhere, in
a combined fit of compulsive lying and equally compulsive longing,
imagined to be love. A love in which neither lover discovers, much less
has to tolerate, anything seriously objectionable in the other. A love
that gives everything and transforms lives. A love that requires only
that one be willing to die for it.
Titanic's manipulative fantasy can't be blamed on writer and
director James Cameron, because in one way or another we've all shared
it. Who among us doesn't want such a love or to believe themselves
capable of paying the price? And who, never having experienced that love,
doesn't secretly feel that they have missed, shall we say, the
boat?
In a superb irony, this most romantic of fantasies is played out
against one of history's most famous calamities. Fantasies, no matter how
cherished, tend to fall apart in moments of dire peril. The masks that we
all hide behind are ripped from out.faces. There is in fact nothing more
challenging--and no truer signal of love--than really recognizing another
human being. Our very lives are at stake in this act of seeing or not
seeing. For in that confrontation, we are forced to see ourselves. To
face others without masks is to watch while they face something in us,
something we have not seen. (A Moslem proverb puts it nicely: You can't
read the words that are written on your own forehead.) The acceptance or
rejection of what another sees is nothing less than the acceptance or
rejection of love. It should come as no surprise, then, that at the
crucial moment of unmasking, many of us, most of the time, look the other
way.
Titanic's filmmakers don?t want anybody to look the other way,
however, so they've banned human beings. The ship is boarded by
stereotypical characters--and actors who revel in not surprising us. Most
prominent is the hero Jack, the quintessential American boy-man, Tom
Sawyer resurrected. Though he plays Jack with charm, Leonardo "DiCaprio
has such limited acting skills and possesses such an androgynous beauty
that he can make any scene unreal just by showing up. That's not
DiCaprio's fault, it's his gift. He relieves an audience of a sense of
consequence.
So, too, does Rose, the impetuous beauty faced with a suffocating
marriage. In a cunning move, filmmakers cast Kate Winslet. She's fleshy
enough not to intimidate most young American women, thus allowing them to
imagine themselves in the part. She also can act (just watch her pull off
the masks with a single expression as Ophelia in Kenneth Branagh's
Hamlet). Winslet is adept enough to be convincing as Rose without making
her seem quite real.
When Winslet's Rose gazes at DiCaprio's Jack, we see she feels
something. But what? Unfortunately, what passes for love in Titanic is
fascination. Sly fascination, concerned fascination, sexual fascination,
whimsical fascination--her look always radiates fascination. Anything
deeper would sink this ship faster than the iceberg.
Cameron would have us buy the assumption that infatuation is enough
to transform a life. In Titanic, Rose is transfigured by fascination, not
by surviving disaster. Indeed, the film is the epitome of an America that
flits from one fascination to another. Our advertising industry--if not
the engine, at least the instigator, of our economy--is based upon
igniting urgent obsession after obsession. A root reason for Titanic's
success is that it equates this same captivation with the most profound
transformative love. It says that the same impulse ignited by a slick
commercial can fulfill your deepest longings.
Yet there's no denying that the deepest longings of millions have
been touched by Titanic. Why should this love story, in that setting,
touch such a nerve? Perhaps the filmmakers have . ignited not only our
romantic longings but our apocalyptic fears.
America today often feels like it's sinking even though statistics
say we're stronger than ever. Our touted technology creates constant,
troublesome changes in our lives, our values, our families. Most people
possess more than they ever did, yet many feel less secure. Who wholly
trusts the stability of the ship? Who doesn't wonder, "Is America
sinking?"
Tags:
billion dollars,
book passage,
booking passage,
cruise ship,
emotional weight,
entertainment,
fantasy,
filmmakers,
freezing to death,
futilely,
great ocean,
high seas,
james cameron,
lifeboats,
longing,
maiden voyage,
movie,
ocean liner,
ounce,
romance,
sea cruises,
ship sinking,
Titanic,
unsinkable ship