DeCasper and others have uncovered more mental feats. Newborns can
not only distinguish their mother from a stranger speaking, but would
rather hear Mom's voice, especially the way it sounds filtered through
amniotic fluid rather than through air. They're xenophobes, too: they
prefer to hear Mom speaking in her native language than to hear her or
someone else speaking in a foreign tongue.
By monitoring changes in fetal heart rate, psychologist JeanPierre
Lecanuet and his colleagues in Paris have found that fetuses can even
tell strangers' voices apart. They also seem to like certain stories more
than others. The fetal heartbeat will slow down when a familiar French
fairy tale such as "La Poulette" ("The Chick") or "Le Petit Crapaud"
("The Little Toad") is read near the mother's belly. When the same reader
delivers another unfamiliar story, the fetal heartbeat stays
steady
The fetus is likely responding to the cadence of voices and
stories, not their actual words, observes Fifer, but the conclusion is
the same: the fetus can listen, learn, and remember at some level, and,
as with most babies and children, it likes the comfort and reassurance of
the familiar.
FETAL PERSONALITY
It's no secret that babies are born with distinct differences and
patterns of activity that suggest individual temperament. Just when and
how the behavioral traits originate in the womb is now the subject of
intense scrutiny.
In the first formal study of fetal temperament in 1996, DiPietro
and her colleagues recorded the heart rate and movements of 31 fetuses
six times before birth and compared them to readings taken twice after
birth. (They've since extended their study to include 100 more fetuses.)
Their findings: fetuses that are very active in the womb tend to be more
irritable infants. Those with irregular sleep/wake patterns in the womb
sleep more poorly as young infants. And fetuses with high heart rates
become unpredictable, inactive babies.
"Behavior doesn't begin at birth," declares DiPietro. "It begins
before and develops in predictable ways." One of the most important
influences on development is the fetal environment. As Harvard's Als
observes, "The fetus gets an enormous amount of 'hormonal bathing'
through the mother, so its chronobiological rhythms are influenced by the
mother's sleep/wake cycles, her eating patterns, her movements."
The hormones a mother puts out in response to stress also appear
critical. DiPietro finds that highly pressured mothers-to-be tend to have
more active fetuses--and more irritable infants. "The most stressed are
working pregnant women," says DiPietro. "These days, women tend to work
up to the day they deliver, even though the implications for pregnancy
aren't entirely clear yet. That's our cultural norm, but I think it's
insane."
Als agrees that working can be an enormous stress, but emphasizes
that pregnancy hormones help to buffer both mother and fetus. Individual
reactions to stress also matter. "The pregnant woman who chooses to work
is a different woman already from the one who chooses not to work," she
explains.
She's also different from the woman who has no choice but to work.
DiPietro's studies show that the fetuses of poor women are distinct
neurobehaviorally-less active, with a less variable heart rate--from the
fetuses of middle-class women. Yet "poor women rate themselves as less
stressed than do working middle-class women," she notes. DiPietro
suspects that inadequate nutrition and exposure to pollutants may
significantly affect the fetuses of poor women.
Stress, diet, and toxins may combine to have a harmful effect on
intelligence. A recent study by biostatistician Bernie Devlin, of the
University of Pittsburgh, suggests that genes may have less impact on IQ
than previously thought and that the environment of the womb may account
for much more. "Our old notion of nature influencing the fetus before
birth and nurture after birth needs an update," DiPietro insists. "There
is an antenatal environment, too, that is provided by the mother."
Parents-to-be who want to further their unborn child's mental
development should start by assuring that the antenatal environment is
wellnourished, low-stress, drug-free. Various authors and "experts" also
have suggested poking the fetus at regular intervals, speaking to it
through a paper tube or "pregaphone," piping in classical music, even
flashing lights at the mother's abdomen.
Does such stimulation work? More importantly: Is it safe? Some who
use these methods swear their children are smarter, more verbally and
musically inclined, more physically coordinated and socially adept than
average. Scientists, however, are skeptical.
"There has been no defended research anywhere that shows any
enduring effect from these stimulations," asserts Filer. "Since no one
can even say for certain when a fetus is awake, poking them or sticking
speakers on the mother's abdomen may be changing their natural sleep
patterns. No one would consider poking or prodding a newborn baby in her
bassinet or putting a speaker next to her ear, so why would you do such a
thing with a fetus?"
Als is more emphatic. "My bet is that poking, shaking, or otherwise
deliberately stimulating the fetus might alter its developmental
sequence, and anything that affects the development of the brain comes at
a cost."
Tags:
abortion,
birth,
cat in the hat,
child development,
developing fetus,
fetal psychology,
fetus,
goose bumps,
grand occasion,
hiccup,
Infancy,
intelligent life,
johns hopkins university,
life in the womb,
loud noises,
mental feats,
newborn baby,
nine weeks,
rapid eye movement,
second trimester,
trivial event,
university psychologist,
vignette,
week old fetus