INTERVIEW
He'll rip off your rose-colored glasses, because he's at war with
simple-minded optimism. But as News Editor Annie Paul found out, he'll do
it with class, taste, and style -- all the things he writes about.
PT: I enjoyed reading your memoir, Doing Battle, very much. I was
struck by the way you constructed it, as a before-and-after narrative
with the war as the transformative experience. Is that the way you
actually think about your life?
PF: Absolutely the war changed everything. I tried to make the book
as honest a reflection as I could of that fact. My whole life has been an
attempt to suggest a dimension of horror and shame that most people don't
know. The expression "a good war" wiped out any impetus for anybody to
find out what it was really like to be in it.
PT: That's the way most people want it -- they don't want to
know?
PF: They don't want to know because it's painful and requires
adjustments to their assumptions that obviously they don't want to
make.
PT: You're committed to stripping away those illusions.
PF: Yes, but it's part of my general intellectual operation. It's
what I do to literature as well and have done through a long career of
university teaching. I rub my students' noses in the most offensive
critical materials. When they want to read Mark Twain, I say, all right,
let's read Democratic Vistas, in which Mark Twain surprises us by finding
the United States one of the worst places in the world. It shocks most
people. That wakes up students and gets them ready to use their minds
freely.
The war book and the war understanding are part of my general
career of stripping off the wrappings from things which make them look
pleasant or acceptable and showing how complicated real life is. In order
to save Europe, you destroy it, which is what we did in the Second World
War. In order to turn the Germans into democratic people, we killed a
great number of them. I like to be the agent of such interesting truths
from time to time.
PT: People sometimes prefer delusion to the truth because it's
easier. But sometimes people do it to protect themselves. They couldn't
go on if they faced the truth.
PF: Yes. It's not something to be easily sarcastic or satiric
about. One should be sympathetic with people who need a false world,
because the real one is intolerable. It's the lesson of all literature
since the Greeks.
As T. S. Eliot put it, humankind cannot stand very much reality.
Hence we have religion, art, higher education. All that is beneficial,
but it all stems from our difficulty in dealing with actuality, which is
too nasty to look at -- the shortness of human life, which wipes out
everything you do; the pain of death; the pain of love. Love always ends
badly, as Hemingway said. Unless the two people die at the same time,
once they undertake a relationship, they're asking for misery and they're
going to get it.
Those truths aren't pleasant to contemplate. And therefore we go
into Disney fantasies and fool ourselves about how easy it is to recover
our lost youth with surgical operations, exercise. It's all hockey One's
going to get older, and it's not going to be much fun. One should get
ready for it early and not be surprised when it happens; it's a way of
joining the human race.
PT: Do you ever think, "This is more reality than I can stomach"?
You're never tempted to protect yourself?.
PF: No, because I have a sense of humor. I think the whole thing is
funny. The Greeks thought the gods were jokers, essentially, and enjoyed
practical jokes. Living in a society that began as a Christian society
where God is sincere and doesn't play games, it's harder to embrace that
attitude, but it's not hard for me.
PT: Is it harder for us as Americans because we didn't have an
antiquity or a Middle Ages...
PF: It's harder for the Americans, or other countries that have
styled themselves upon the American promise. That's one of the tasks of
education. The high schools have utterly failed in it, by the way. We
need to chip away at this optimism constantly, at this sense that when
the stock market goes up, it's not going to go down.
Wouldn't it be nice if life were like the life depicted in Snow
White, and we had cute little dwarfs to amuse us and no evil that cannot
be easily dealt with? Now and then, there is something like that utterly
motiveless mass murder accomplished by the two children in Arkansas that
ought to shake our sensibilities. But it doesn't. We can easily override
it with optimism. We say, "well, we'll have better gun control" or "there
must be a solution to that problem."
There's no solution to it. It's a human problem. People are
meaninglessly wicked sometimes. Religion used to show why, but religion
doesn't help any more at all. Psychiatry used to show why, but that's
discredited now. Most Americans don't like when I say it, but most
problems have no answer.
That's not really a pessimistic philosophy. It says you can survive
this bizarre life without damage if you have the right attitude and
regard the whole thing as a massive irony
PT: Do you think that's a cultural immaturity, to not want to face
up to that?
PF: Yes, I do, but we're only 150 years old. This kind of
philosophy comes much more readily to Europeans, which is one reason why
I love living in Europe. There's a natural joyous pessimism, which
encourages people to expect the most awful things and to laugh about
it.
Tags:
annie paul,
critical materials,
democratic vistas,
dimension of horror,
germans,
good war,
impetus,
mark twain,
memoir,
news editor,
noses,
Paul Fussell,
places in the world,
reality,
rose colored glasses,
second world war,
transformative experience,
truth,
university teaching,
War,
war book,
whole life,
wrappings