Offers some slightly reassuring news for those concerned about
being kept alive by gadgetry inappropriately prolonging life. New
national survey of doctors and nurses who treat dying patients reveals
that they do not endorse 'overly burdensome' care to patients nearing the
end; Reported in the 'American Journal of Public Health, volume 83,
number 1; Reasons given by doctors and nurses on why they often act
against their conscience in providing care to the terminally ill;
Details.
By
PT Staff, published on July 01, 1993
MEDICAL ETHICS
ONE OF THE MORE PERVASIVE MEDICAL nightmares of our times pits an
otherwise-dead patient against gadgetry inappropriately prolonging
life.
For those concerned about such a final indignity comes some
slightly reassuring news. A new national survey of doctors and nurses who
treat dying patients reveals that they, too, do not endorse "overly
burdensome" care to patients nearing the end. They support the right of
patients to forgo unwanted treatment.
But unfortunately, according to the survey, doctors and nurses
often act against their conscience in providing care to the terminally
ill, reported the American Journal of Public Health (Vol. 83, No.
1).
Why, then, do they do it? Here are some reasons the survey
uncovered:
o Medical personnel are reluctant to withdraw treatment once they
start it
o They're not aware of national guidelines on the use of
life-sustaining treatment;
o They aren't sure about the law, ethics, or professional
standards;
o They are not psychologically comfortable with stopping
treatment;
o They're uncomfortable soliciting patients' personal views on what
is an acceptable quality of life.
"What we need" in this country, conclude the the authors, "is a
better understanding of ethics and the law, and the courage to talk
openly about death and dying."
Tags:
acceptable quality,
american journal of public health,
death,
doctors and nurses,
ethics,
gadgetry,
health vol,
indignity,
journal of public health,
law,
law ethics,
life,
medicine,
new national survey,
personal views,
professional standards,
quality of life,
terminally ill