The original instincts, now distilled as intuition, were probably
based on a rapid access or fast-track system, separate from conscious
thought, unencumbered by hesitation and doubt. Once speech was developed,
allowing the transfer of information, the brain began its rapid expansion
and evolved the ten-billion-cell neocortex. Here, logical,
speech-promoted intelligence took over at the expense of
experiential-based instinct. And the mind developed barriers, or censors,
to protect the concentrated attention of clear, alert reasoning from
invasion by all else stored in the brain; we now know that these barriers
become porous during dreaming, defective in psychopathology, and collapse
altogether in senility.
Intuition is, in my view, the product of all the processed
ancestral instincts of the species, through which unconditioned reflexes
become conditioned and organized into patterns of adaptive behavior
called instinct. Ultimately instincts coalesce into intuition, the
capacity for which is stored deep in the brain. The wisdom of language
suggests that this is so. Despite the fact that many people have little
respect for the concept of intuition (in these days of over-reasoning),
all of us still refer to intuition as instinct. "It was an instinctive
reaction." "I have a good instinct for this." Of course, the greatest
evidence is simply the survival of the species in the face of extreme and
unpredictable events of nature.
CRITICAL CONDITIONS
Intuition, then, is necessarily processed unconsciously. As a
result, it has been reduced to a myth and allowed to sink into the
province of mystics and fringe groups. Nevertheless, the descent of
intuition from prehistory as a means of surviving changes and predators
and finding ways to deal with enemies ensures that it is still the
intelligence of everyday life. Human relationships, especially
child-rearing, matching oneself to a mate and a job-these are the chief
provinces of intuition. In its wholeness, intuition is the form of
intelligence that includes our social sense, familiar with the endless
variety of human relationships and deeds.
In elevating rational-scientific thinking, and dismissing
intuition, the Enlightenment confined its approval to a very narrow band
of human intelligence-logical, deductive, proof-oriented mental
operations. That intelligence has brought us the scientific revolution,
high technology, and a great many material goods. But it does not take an
intuitive genius (all geniuses are) to observe that the wanton
application of this line of thinking now endangers human society and its
terrestrial home. The earth is so terribly befouled and overpopulated
that our very advances now threaten our very survival. By their very
nature, the study and control of these titanic forces cannot be
accomplished by exact science.
Increasingly over the last decade, businesses have begun to realize
that analytical thinking arrives too late for a 24-hour global
marketplace. In its quest for an edge, private enterprise has become very
receptive to the idea of intuition-although intuition has yet to make
inroads in public management, marketing, or advertising.
As a way of advancing both the research and application of
intuition, particularly in the business world, a Global Intuition Network
(GIN) was set up in the late 1980s by Weston Agor, Ph.D., former
professor of management at the University of Texas, at the behest of an
American industrialist. Comprised of people all over the world who are
working independently on intuition, the network sponsored its first
conference in 1991, in Hawaii. Last summer, I convened the second GIN
conference, in Toronto. By this time, there was important representation
of serious scientists paying attention to research in
intuition-engineers, mathematicians, and psychologists. Intuition is
clearly undergoing rehabilitation.
But it isn't just scientists and business leaders who are
interested in this power of the mind. Inquiries come from people in all
walks of life-people eager to know that there is more to intelligence
than science and technology have given us. They perceive the limits of
the technological way of looking at things. They sense that a larger
spectrum of intelligence needs to be brought to bear on the world's
problems. Of course, creative artists have always known that creativity
is cradled in intuition. If intuition were not already available today it
would have to be invented.
MOWED DOWN IN THE FIELD
In my studies of intuition, I started where all scientific ventures
start -- the hunch, itself an intuitive skill. I set out to prove the
hypothesis that intuition is the secret of success in most endeavors, and
especially in business.
I began with a field study of organizations, to see whether those
that were successful had intuitive people at the helm. I wanted to see
where those given to intuition-intuits were located on the organizational
ladder, whether they were at key decision-making jobs. And to see whether
those who weren't so located were unsuccessful. Success would be measured
in terms of the world of business-bottomline profitability, efficiency,
productivity, and effectiveness, with job satisfaction running as the
dark horse.
Tags:
believer,
brain,
chronological age,
human intelligence,
intelligence,
intuition,
IQ2,
jewel in the crown,
lunatic fringe,
mental science,
narrow spectrum,
natural physical environment,
old whore,
psychics,
psychology lab,
quotient,
rational thought,
red light district,
reputable scientists,
social environment,
test,
traditional intelligence